<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack Beatty, Public Intellectual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtcast.org/ideas/jack-beatty-public-intellectual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtcast.org/ideas/jack-beatty-public-intellectual/</link>
	<description>An online watering hole for ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:52:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pener</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcast.org/ideas/jack-beatty-public-intellectual/comment-page-1/#comment-24034</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtcast.org/casts/jack-beatty-public-intellectual#comment-24034</guid>
		<description>Jack Beatty is the most impressive &quot;public intellectual&quot; that I have come across since Chalmers Johnson.  Too bad his and other intellectuals&#039; thoughts have fallen on deaf ears these past decades.  So now I repeatedly watch &quot;Idiocracy,&quot; a movie about the future 500 years from now where a character boasted about getting a law degree from Costco!  The only problem I&#039;m having is I realize that we do not have to wait 500 years to verify this future prediction by Mike Judge, it is happening now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Beatty is the most impressive &#8220;public intellectual&#8221; that I have come across since Chalmers Johnson.  Too bad his and other intellectuals&#8217; thoughts have fallen on deaf ears these past decades.  So now I repeatedly watch &#8220;Idiocracy,&#8221; a movie about the future 500 years from now where a character boasted about getting a law degree from Costco!  The only problem I&#8217;m having is I realize that we do not have to wait 500 years to verify this future prediction by Mike Judge, it is happening now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arne Hessenbruch</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcast.org/ideas/jack-beatty-public-intellectual/comment-page-1/#comment-11121</link>
		<dc:creator>Arne Hessenbruch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtcast.org/casts/jack-beatty-public-intellectual#comment-11121</guid>
		<description>This is a moving interview. I have often heard Jack Beatty on On Point, and while I continue to be impressed with the breadth of his knowledge and his articulation of it, I have also been mildly irritated by the intensity with which he discusses social hierarchies, an intensity that on occasion resembles an harangue. But I have now looked into the soul of the man (sorry, couldn’t resist that one) and I am now at peace with his intensity. Jack, please continue to wear it on your sleeve.

The topic of the public intellectual seems to be particularly apposite for this site. Jenny Attiyeh has all the makings of an intellectual (Beatty does too, of course) and she also would like to see the intellectual discourse in the public realm. But I would like to posit the view that for an intellectual to count as public, the public realm has to feature her or him prominently. (Sartre qualified - he was generally known throughout the French populace.)

Assuming that I am right, it might be interesting to speculate just why the public realm no longer includes a niche for public intellectuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a moving interview. I have often heard Jack Beatty on On Point, and while I continue to be impressed with the breadth of his knowledge and his articulation of it, I have also been mildly irritated by the intensity with which he discusses social hierarchies, an intensity that on occasion resembles an harangue. But I have now looked into the soul of the man (sorry, couldn’t resist that one) and I am now at peace with his intensity. Jack, please continue to wear it on your sleeve.</p>
<p>The topic of the public intellectual seems to be particularly apposite for this site. Jenny Attiyeh has all the makings of an intellectual (Beatty does too, of course) and she also would like to see the intellectual discourse in the public realm. But I would like to posit the view that for an intellectual to count as public, the public realm has to feature her or him prominently. (Sartre qualified &#8211; he was generally known throughout the French populace.)</p>
<p>Assuming that I am right, it might be interesting to speculate just why the public realm no longer includes a niche for public intellectuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtcast.org/ideas/jack-beatty-public-intellectual/comment-page-1/#comment-9183</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtcast.org/casts/jack-beatty-public-intellectual#comment-9183</guid>
		<description>This interview makes one think of R. Hofstadter&#039;s &quot;Anti-Intellectualism in American Life.&quot;  Edmund Wilson, author of the classic &quot;To the Finland Station,&quot; also comes to mind as the preeminent man of ltrs of the first-half of the 20th cent.  The interview, while well done, could have been broadened by eliciting Beatty&#039;s thoughts on these two pivotal works.

Arguably, the current intellectuals of greatest import are science fiction writers, which is another realm unaddressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This interview makes one think of R. Hofstadter&#8217;s &#8220;Anti-Intellectualism in American Life.&#8221;  Edmund Wilson, author of the classic &#8220;To the Finland Station,&#8221; also comes to mind as the preeminent man of ltrs of the first-half of the 20th cent.  The interview, while well done, could have been broadened by eliciting Beatty&#8217;s thoughts on these two pivotal works.</p>
<p>Arguably, the current intellectuals of greatest import are science fiction writers, which is another realm unaddressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

